• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A number produced without questions is a warning, not a service level. A competent team responds with a list of questions: about who owns the data and what happens on failure. A provider that prices before understanding the scope is pricing a guess, and that guess will be corrected later — on your budget.

Look out for any distance between the people you meet and those who eventually appear in the repository. Insist on the names and CVs of the actual team in the agreement, with a clause covering replacement. A vendor that will only describe abstract roles and swift development agency never names people is preserving the option to staff you with whoever is free.

Require the source repository from day one. A team that delivers a build only at the end of each phase is inviting you to accept a black box. Visible commits show you who is really on the project far better than any status report. This extends to the automated test suite: if there is no pipeline, laravel or symfony quality claims remain just talk.

Loose phrasing around intellectual property is not an accident. The document needs to state plainly that all outputs produced under it belong to the client upon settlement of the relevant invoice. Look too at which country's law applies and the milestone terms: heavy prepayment with no deliverable attached eliminates the only leverage you have.

Finally, pay attention to communication. Ask how much working-time overlap the teams will share with your timezone, which named person handles your questions and software outsourcing models how quickly. A few hours of overlap is usually enough; zero overlap stretches every clarification into a lost day. Sloppy written English in the early emails does not improve once the work starts.