• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A number produced without questions is a bad sign. An experienced provider returns questions first: about who owns the data and what happens on failure. A vendor that prices without asking anything is working from a template, and hire nuxt.js programmer a guess becomes a change request later — at your expense.

Watch for a mismatch between the team in the pitch backend and frontend technologies we use the people who will code. Ask for named engineers in the contract, with a clause covering replacement. A dedicated team vs project-based outsourcing that will only describe abstract roles and never names people is keeping its own flexibility at your cost.

Ask for access to the repository from the first week. A partner that delivers code only at milestones expects you to trust a black box. Regular commits and pull requests show you how many people are really working far better than any status report. The same holds for the build and deployment setup: if there is no pipeline, llm application development quality claims remain just talk.

Vague contract language around intellectual property is not an oversight. The contract should state in plain terms that all deliverables become the property of your business upon settlement of the relevant invoice. Check also the governing law and the milestone terms: a large upfront payment with no milestone tied to it takes away your only leverage.

Last, examine the working rhythm. Establish what overlap the teams will share with your working day, which person handles day-to-day questions and on what response times. Some genuine overlap is usually enough; no overlap converts every clarification into a twenty-four hour round trip. Unclear written communication in the proposal will not improve later.